I admit. I have to give Topps come credit here. Just for a little fun, they went in a different direction with their insert set. As the question mark implies, the picture may, or may not be, perfect. In this case, it's the latter.
Do you see it?
It's a fun little activity, at least the first time you see the card. What do I like about it? The name of the set on the card is hidden. A set with the name "Picture" in the title allows the picture to be the focal point. I like that. Even the gimmicky imperfect part doesn't detract from the overall effect. It's not like they replaced Pedro's head with the Incredible Hulk's.
Do you see it?
So, it makes for a great card. It's an insert, so I don't mind that it doesn't have things like Pedro's name, position, etc. I'll let the base card take care of that stuff. There are no foil spirals or zigzags to compete for my attention. There's nothing. It's simple, and wonderful with nothing in the way.
Except, of course, for the intentional "imperfection."
It’s hot stove season, which means a lot of rumors. Rumors
about free agents. Rumors about players under contract. Rumors about possible
trades. It’s a lot of fun.
During the trade rumors portion, Mookie Betts’s name has
come up quite a bit. And, why wouldn’t he? He’s an attractive prospect that I’m
sure any number of teams would like to add to their roster. It seems, though,
that many in Red Sox Nation are completely opposed to letting that happen.
Which brings me to one question.
Oh, sure. I know you’re aware that I consider every player to
be potential trade bait in the right deal. There are no names on the roster
that another team could include that would stop me from at least reading the
entire trade offer. Obviously, if the first three names are Ortiz, Pedroia,
Bogaerts…the name at the end better be Trout. But, at least I’d read and see
what it said.
But, this is even beyond that. Frankly, I think the Sox
should be actively trying to sell “high” on Betts. After all, what is he?
What’s the best you expect out of him? I’m not even talking about this season.
What’s the best you expect out of Mookie Betts, ever? I’m guessing it’s not
2004 Manny Ramirez. I’m guessing it’s not 2011 Jacoby Ellsbury either. 2008
Dustin Pedroia? Maybe. 2013 Jacoby Ellsbury? More likely.
Isn’t that really what we’re looking at as a peak for Betts?
Especially the next handful of years? .285-15-70? Why is that untouchable?
After all, we just had a guy do that, and we couldn’t let him leave for the big
contract elsewhere fast enough. Good riddance. We can replace you with Jackie
Now that guy is untouchable?
Sure, Mookie was fun last season. He was exactly what the
team needed at the end of a lost, dreary season. He was a blast of excitement.
He was something enjoy as he showed us all what he could do.
But, it’s not like he was having Phil Plantier’s September
call-up. So, why would we guard him with an iron shield? Heck, the Sox don’t
even have a position open for him at the moment.
Shouldn’t he be the first name on the offer sheet to
Philadelphia? Shouldn’t he be the exact chip that you’d use to get a proven top
of the rotation lefty with a great postseason resume? Shouldn’t he be the guy
that Philly overvalues from afar? Instead, people are actually willing to stop
a deal for Cole Hamels, or anyone else for that matter, if Mookie’s name in
brought up. It’s unbelievable.
Am I wrong with Mookie’s assessment? Do people think he is,
in fact, going to be 2005 David Ortiz? Or, are people confusing “fun” with
“productive”? (Maybe it’s an infielder thing. They certainly confuse the two
when it comes to the second baseman)
Today we wish a very Happy Birthday to former outfielder and
fan favorite Darnell McDonald!
McDonald was an outfielder on the forgettable 2010 to 2012
Sox teams. He had a little bit of Daniel Nava in him. He had a better pedigree
than Nava, being a former first round pick. But, in the decade since then, he
had appeared in less than 100 games. So, there was an “off the scrap heap”
feeling to him. When he started performing well, the fans fell in love with the
story. He played a couple hundred games for the Sox, before leaving town.
I saw McDonald play live five times in 2010, and he started
four of those games. In those games, he hit a couple homers, and scored a
couple runs. All the while playing a solid outfield.
The addition of Carl Crawford in 2011 spelled the basic end
of McDonald’s playing time. He only appeared in one more game I was at the rest
of his time in Boston.
But, he was still a popular player while he was here. He did
a great job filling in when the Mike Cameron experiment failed miserably.
That’s really all you can ask out of a player.
It’s time for the Seventh Annual Section 36 Scavenger Hunt! I’m
sure you remember how it works. If not, I’ll remind you. Below, you’ll find a
list of 36 items for you to try and find. When you find an item, take a picture
of it and send it along to me. Whoever sends me pictures of the most items
wins. Pretty simple, right? We’ll make the end of the hunt be 12:36 PM eastern
time on February 5, 2015. This both gives enough time to find the stuff, and
fills the time almost right up to pitchers and catchers reporting to Spring
Training. Sound like fun? What do you win if you find the most items? Worldwide
fame and admiration! I will post the winner’s name (and picture if one is
provided) on this very site and hail them as the 2014 Scavenger Hunt Champion!
I’m sure that Bryanne has found her worldwide fame to be quite an honor this
past year. If you actually want a prize you can hold in your hand, I’ll award a
scorebook made up of the Section 36 official scorecards, bound together to
allow you to score twenty games! Not too bad, right? If I come up with something else between now and then, maybe I'll add it on. Ready to get started? Here
is this year’s list of items to get pictures of:
1. Red Sox car magnet
2. Ticket to World Series game played by the Red Sox
3. Red Sox retired number
4. Official Program from 1999 All-Star game
5. “Sports Illustrated” magazine with Red Sox player on
27. Condiment with a picture of Red Sox player on it
28. 36 of something
29. Lansdowne St
30. 2013 World Championship banner
31. Red Sox license plate holder
32. Biography of Red Sox player
33. “Fenway Park 100 Seasons” baseball
34. Hallmark Ornament of Red Sox player
35. Female Red Sox fan
36. Male Red Sox fan
A quick clarification. Unless it says otherwise, “Red Sox
Player” refers to anyone who ever played for the Sox in a regular season game.
That counts even if the player isn’t depicted as a Red Sox player in the
picture. So, Jim would be able to use anything from his Phillies Room depicting
players like Curt Schilling and Jonathan Papelbon, even if they’re in their
Now, since I want this to be a scavenger hunt, and not a
google search, I’ll need a way to make sure you actually find these items
yourself. So, in order to qualify any picture must have any one of these
three things in it.
This might be the easiest way. If you’re in the picture, I can be pretty
sure you actually found the item. This has one advantage in that it
doesn’t have to be a new picture. If you went to Fenway last summer and
took a picture on Lansdowne St, that would work. Or,
Section 36 logo. Just have it showing somewhere in the picture. Or,
address of this blog, “www.section-36.blogspot.com” , written somewhere in
the picture. Write it out on a piece of paper, on a sidewalk with chalk,
on someone’s leg, whatever. (Just don’t vandalize anything).
That make sense? So, send in your pictures to me, section36
at gmail dot com (I bet you know which parts to replace with symbols) You can
even tweet it to me, or use a facebook msg. Whatever works for you! It would be
nice if you told me which items you thought were in each picture. If there’s a
tie between people who have the same number of found items, the tiebreaker will
be the person who did it with the fewest number of pictures. If you get a
picture of a Female Red Sox fan, wearing a Shane Victorno t-shirt, while
holding a Red Sox coaster, it would be 3 items in one picture. That’s a great
start, although I’m sure you can do better. One year, Jere had over 20 items in
a single photo! (If I need a second tiebreaker, I’ll have a vote to decide the
I think that covers everything! It’s now up to you to start
sending me your pictures. I’ll keep reminding you as the months go by.
It’s an important question. After all, if I don’t know what
player is “valuable” how can I ever hope to decide who the Most Valuable Player
So, what is value?
People are very eager to point out that Major League Baseball
isn’t giving out a “Player of the Year” award today. It’s a Most Valuable
Player Award. Apparently that’s different.
Valuable means giving the most value to his team. But,
that’s somehow different than putting up the best stats. Could it mean the
player that best fits the needs of the team he’s on? Take the 2013 Red Sox.
Jacoby Ellsbury was pretty valuable.The Sox really needed a speedy guy to get
on base a lot in front of Pedroia, Ortiz, and Napoli. Ells was perfect. He was
on base all the time, and his legs attracted a lot of attention. That was
pretty valuable. But, if he was on the Astros, without the bats behind him,
that might not have mattered as much. Or, at all. A guy at second is of no
value if nobody drives him in. Someone like Mike Napoli might have been more
valuable to the Astros because he can drive himself in more often. Napoli might
have been more valuable to the Astros than he was to the Red Sox, who also had
Pedroia and Ortiz to fall back on.
Does that mean Ellsbury was more valuable than Napoli, just
because of the team they played on? That’s weird. Shouldn’t the most valuable
player in the league be the most valuable to every team? That would make sense.
That’s where I have trouble with the whole “MVP needs to
come from a playoff team” argument. A valuable player should be a valuable
player, right? Frankly, as I’ve said before, a good player might be even more
valuable to a lousy team than a playoff team.
Say I have a baseball card collection…which I do. Say I have
a Ted Williams rookie card in my collection…which I don’t. That right there
makes my collection as a whole pretty impressive. That would be a pretty
valuable card to my collection. Without it, the Jim Rice rookie led collection
isn’t all that great. But, what if Keith Olberman had the Ted Williams
rookie…which he might. He also has the T-206 Wagner card, and any number of
fantastic cards. The Williams rookie might be a throwaway card to him, and not
valuable at all. So, the decent card is more valuable to a lesser collection.
Isn’t the same true for a player? If the Giants had
Giancarlo Stanton, would they have performed any better this season? Hard to
see how. But, the Marlins were only is even marginal contention because they
had Stanton. Isn’t that pretty valuable?
So, what should the voters be looking at when they vote for
“most valuable”? They player who happens to fill his specific team’s specific
needs? Is that value? Or, the player that would add the most to any team he was
on? Is Mike Trout just as valuable to the Angels as he would be to the Red Sox?
Is that important?
In my collection, I currently have every Red Sox Media Guide dating back to 1998. I love flipping through them to see what tidbits they contain. I figured that if I liked it, you might enjoy taking a look along with me. So, I had a not-so- random number generator select a page from the 2011 edition to talk about today. It selected page 8
Page 8 talks about the Red Sox foundation. One of the unusual aspects of the sale of the Red Sox to the Henry group was that the Yawkey Foundation was a charitable organization. As the sale was finalized, this led to the creation of the Red Sox Foundation to offset any charitable losses as a result of the sale. Since then, the Foundation has grown and grown. The page talks about the Foundation being involved in five main programs, including the Red Sox Scholars, Rookie and RBI Youth Baseball Leagues, and the Home Base Program. Of particular interest today, the Home Base program provides evaluations, support services and care for veterans with PTSD and TBI. The Run to Home Base is a 9K fundraising run ending at home plate in Fenway. In 2010 the run raised $2.5 million. Interested in donating? Click the links to reach the Red Sox Foundation, or the Run to Home Base specifically. Of course, all that information can be found on the Media Guide page, along with lots of other great information. Just like every page.
If you've looked at the sidebar of this here blog recently, you noticed a new graphic for the "BYB Hub"
"What on earth is that?" you may have asked.
I'm glad you did.
BYB Hub is the brainchild of Robert Casey, the fine creator of the "Bleeding Yankee Blue" blog. (I know. It's OK. Really) His idea was to create a spot where baseball blogs could all be listed so that people could be exposed to them at one shot. So, after you read this blog and enjoy it thoroughly, but want to see other great blogs to read, click on the picture in the sidebar, and check out some of the blogs listed on the BYB Hub.
(Unless, of course, you've already been to the BYB Hub, and that's how you got here in the first place. In that case, "Welcome!" I'm glad you decided to visit. Enjoy your stay, and check out all the great things Section 36 has to offer! Did you see the pix or the scorecard? Don't forget to like me, and follow me, and follow me so you don't miss anything.)
About that one word that's been such an elephant in the room. Yeah, I was a little nervous too when a Yankees blog asked me to participate in the Hub. But, Bleeding Yankees Blue is a good read. Plus, there's that saying about keeping your friends close, but your enemies closer. So, I figure there's a benefit from giving the Hub an alternate voice. Don't you? Besides, he plans on adding blogs from all baseball angles eventually. Plus, it's not like the Hub has a pinstripe motif, or anything. (Have to admit I was a bit worried about that when I first opened the graphic)
So, I certainly hope you'll be visiting Section 36 every day. After you do, check out BYB Hub to find something else to read.
As a Red Sox fan, I've been to many games at Fenway Park. I've sat in the first row along third base, and the last row in right field. I've sat in roof boxes, field boxes, and the right field grandstand. The best seats of them all, however, are Section 36. Dead center field. You can see the field, enjoy the Sun, and have the time of your life.